Page 60 - WSAVA2018
P. 60

 25-28 September, 2018 | Singapore
real-time PCR). These cats have regressive infection, where integrated provirus (DNA) and, sometimes viral RNA, can be detected by qPCR, but at lower levels and with restricted tropism compared with progressively infected cats. The prevalence of regressive infection reported in the field ranges from less than 1% to
10%. Regressively infected cats pose minimal risk to other cats, although disease outcomes are still under investigation. Loss of immunological containment of regressive infection resulting in progressive infection seems to be rare. Blood donors with regressive infection can transmit FeLV infection with recipients developing fatal progressive infection. Therefore, feline blood donors should test negative on FeLV antigen and qPCR tests.
Abortive infection, only detectable by seroconversion, is rare and of no consequence to the cat or in contacts.
Interpretation of FeLV test results
Positive serology must be confirmed with qPCR. Most cats exposed to FeLV will test positive for FeLV antigen initially and retesting is important. p27 positive and qPCR positive cats should be isolated from negative cats
and rested around 12 weeks later. If the cat develops progressive infection, it will remain persistently antigen positive. If the cat develops regressive infection the antigen test will become negative. Cats with known exposure to FeLV that test p27 negative should be retested in 30 days. Neither vaccination against FeLV or maternal antibodies affect FeLV p27 serology results.
FIV overview
FIV is a retrovirus in the lentivirus genus. Worldwide seroprevalence varies from <5% to >30% depending
on the region and the population tested. Territorial aggression is the major mode of FIV transmission
and free-roaming, entire, sick, male cats are at high
risk from infection. FIV-infected cats are at risk from immune dysfunction although many have a normal life expectancy. Immune dysfunction can manifest as atypical and refractory bacterial, viral or protozoal infections and parasitoses. In second stage FIV, persistent cytopenias, high grade lymphoma, unexplained weight loss and neurological signs can occur. Confinement of uninfected cats is the most effective way to prevent transmission.
A field study demonstrated a protective rate of 56% for Fel-O-Vax FIV vaccine (Boehringer Ingelheim).(2) FIV presents no known zoonotic risk
FIV serology
Serology is the first line test for FIV. PoC tests or laboratory-based ELISAs have high sensitivities and specificities for antibody detection. In patients over 6 months of age that have not been vaccinated against FIV, anti-FIV antibodies are a marker for FIV infection. Where vaccination with Fel-O-Vax FIV is available, test
selection is important because PoC kits vary in their ability to distinguish vaccine-induced from infection- associated anti-FIV antibodies. Witness FeLV/FIV (Zoetis) and Anigen Rapid FIV/FeLV (BioNote) showed high specificities for identifying FIV-infection in several studies.(3, 4) Interference with these tests by vaccination can still occur particularly after a recent booster.
(5, 6) IDEXX SNAP FIV/FeLV Combo is not useful to discriminate vaccinated from infected cats. The reliability of a negative serology result is unchanged by the introduction of the FIV vaccine.
FIV molecular testing
Molecular tests target FIV DNA provirus and some
also detect viral RNA in plasma by qPCR. Diagnostic sensitivity that is 5-15% lower than serology and specificity comparable with serology are reported for commercial qPCR tests.(7, 8) qPCR should not be used as a screening test for FIV. qPCR can be used as an adjunct to serology to determine the true FIV-status of cats in certain circumstances including; seropositive cats that may be vaccinated against FIV, seropositive cats less than 6 months of age and seronegative cats that have may been recently exposed to FIV. qPCR can detect viral RNA in blood within 1 to 2 weeks and DNA within 3 weeks of experimental infection but differences in virus strain, dose and assay sensitivities mean that it is hard to predict how long after natural exposure qPCR can reliably detect FIV infection.(9) A positive FIV qPCR results indicates that the cat is almost certainly infected, whereas negative qPCR results are inconclusive.
Interpretation and confirmation of FIV serology
Interpretation of the results of serological screening requires the integration of clinical findings from the individual cat to guide whether repeat serology or qPCR is indicated and what the timing of repeat testing should be. Negative serology results are generally reliable because the sensitivity of serological tests approaches 100%. The time to seroconversion following natural infection is variable and can be prolonged.
A seronegative cat that may have been recently exposed should be isolated from FIV-infected cats or cats of unknown FIV-status and retested after 60 days. Rarely, cats in the terminal stage of FIV-infection have impaired antibody production despite high plasma
viral loads. If advanced FIV infection is suspected, negative serology results should be followed-up with qPCR testing.Confirmation of positive serology results
is recommended. The testing methodology used for confirmation will depend on assessment of the patient’s FIV-infection risk, test availability, whether or not prior FIV vaccination can be ruled out and financial considerations. In cats with a low FIV risk, such as healthy, purebred, young, indoor cats, confirmation of positive serology is essential because the positive predictive value (PPV) of serology is reduced in low-risk groups. The reason for
  58
43RD WORLD SMALL ANIMAL VETERINARY ASSOCIATION CONGRESS AND 9TH FASAVA CONGRESS








































































   58   59   60   61   62